History Hoydens


Historical Romance Writers Dishing the Dirt on Research

16 April 2008

The aftermath of Waterloo & Peterloo

A few weeks ago, I blogged about the social and political context in 1817 England and Scotland, in which Beneath a Silent Moon (the second book in my Charles & Mélanie Fraser series, which is about to be reissued) takes place. The third book in the series, The Mask of Night (as yet unpublished) begins two and a half years later, at a Twelfth Night masquerade ball on 6 January 1820. Britain is still grappling with many of the same issues and so are the characters.

Waterloo is only four and a half years in the past. Napoleon has been defeated and exiled to the tiny island of St. Helena, but the ruling powers from Whitehall to Paris to Moscow still fear he could escape. In France, a restored Bourbon King is on the throne, and the “Ultra Royalist” faction is in power. Their zeal to exact revenge for everything since the Revolution has brought about the “White Terror” in which scores of former Bonpartists have been imprisoned and executed. In this fevered atmosphere, political games are played for life and death stakes and personal loyalty is an ephemeral thing.

The Come de Flahaut, a real historical figure who plays an important role in The Mask of Night, is fortunate to have escaped France. In the words of a character in the book, had he remained “he might well have lost his head, and not over a pretty woman this time.” Flahaut was an officer in Napoleon’s army and the lover of the Empress Josephine’s daughter, Hortense (who was unhappily married to Napoleon;s younger brother, Louis). Flahaut is also the illegitimate son of Talleyrand, Napoleon’s wily one-time Foreign Minister. Talleyrand has managed to survive under the Bourbons (he represented France at the Congress of Vienna) and has helped protect Flahaut. Flahaut has sought refuge in Britain and married the British heiress Margaret Mercer Elphinstone (whose father, Admiral Viscount Keith, escorted Napoleon to St. Helena; research into the connections between real historical people often convinces me I shouldn't worry that my fictional characters are too intertwined :-).

Flahaut's former lover Hortense Bonaparte is also exiled from France, living in Switzerland with her two young sons. The plot of The Mask of Night has her make an entirely fictional secret trip to Britain. In my fictional world, Hortense and the Bonaparte family have past ties to my heroine Mélanie. Hortense calls on these ties in the book, putting Mélanie in a dangerous predicament.

While the British Government still worries about Bonapartist plots, the situation in Britain itself is far form easy. As I mentioned in my post on the situation in 1817, the Napoleonic Wars left Britain victorious but badly in debt. Work is scarce and the price of food is exorbitant. The Tory government (Lord Liverpool the Prime Minister, Lord Sidmouth the Home Secretary, Lord Castlereagh the Foreign Secretary, among others) have a pervasive fear of violent revolution at home. (Echoes of the French Revolution reverberate through the politics of the day). At the same time, the Government Ministers fear Parliamentary reform and see repression rather than any sort of reform as the best way of preserving the world as they know it.

But while the Government fear revolution, they recognize that events such as the mob surrounding the Prince Regent on they way to the opening of Parliament in 1817 help pave the way for repressive measures. They also realize that revolutionary talk, violent acts, and rioting are an effective way to separate moderate radicals and reform-minded Whigs from their more extreme fellows. As Will Gordon, a young actor and radical, says to Charles in The Mask of Night, “And with every act of violence more sober bourgeois and nervous aristocrats decide that even modest reform is the first step to the guillotine.” With this end in mind, the Government, particularly Lord Sidmouth, employed agents provocateurs, who infiltrated radical groups and not only reported back to Westminster but actually incited violent action.

On 16 August 1819, four and a half months before The Mask of Night begins, a radical meeting took place at St. Peter’s Fields, Manchester. Manchester had been the site of prior meetings and demonstrations, mostly in favor of reform of Parliament and against the Corn Laws. There had been some reports of men drilling with staves, though this was perhaps at the instigation of agents provocateurs in the pay of the Government. The 16 August meeting, however, began as a more festive event with an almost country fair atmosphere. Radical groups from all over the country arrived with bands playing and banners flapping in the breeze. The men were unarmed, even with staves, and many brought their wives and children with them.

Several local magistrates watched the meeting from a house overlooking the square as a crowd of sixty to eighty thousand people gathered to hear speeches by the famed radical speaker Henry (”Orator”) Hunt and others. As Hunt began to speak, mounted men charge the crowd, trampling spectators and attacking with sabres. Almost six hundred were wounded (including over a hundred women) and at least eleven were killed. The Government claimed afterwards that they had urged caution and the local magistrates had panicked and ordered the attack. Sidmouth, the Home Secretary, would have sanctioned the use of the 15th Hussars, who were stationed in Manchester, but most of the carnage was committed by the local Yeomanry, who may have been under orders from the magistrates. However, as J.B. Priestley mentions in The Prince of Pleasure, there have also been suggestions that Sidmouth had sent his own instructions to Manchester in secret. As with so many historical events, the truth of what happened remains open to debate.

The events of 16 August came to be called Peterloo, a darkly ironic play on Waterloo . The Prince Regent responded by thanking the magistrates and the military for “decisive and efficient measures for the preservation of the public peace.” As Priestley describes it, while “Tory loyalists were congratulating the Manchester Yeomanry as if they had cleaved their way trough Napoleon’s Old Guard, to most people in the country, of the middle as well as the working class, Peterloo came as a profound shock. Throughout the late summer and early autumn of 1819, industrial workers, especially in the Midlands and around Tyneside, still furiously reacting to the news, were buying sharpened knives to fasten to their staves–and so make pikes.”

The battle lines in the country were more clearly drawn than ever. Lord Althrop, a Whig, brought a motion in Parliament for an inquiry over Peterloo. But to some, words and Parliamentary inquiries didn’t seem an effective response. In The Mask of Night, Mélanie remembers their friend David discussing a speech he planned to make in support of Althorp’s motion and his lover Simon turning on him:

Simon had clunked down the decanter and said, Where the hell is that going to get you? Even if it passes, do you think it will change anything? The usual irony had been quite gone from his face and voice.

David had taken out his handkerchief and blotted up the port that had splashed from the decanter. It’s a start, he’d said, in a hard, even voice.

That’s brilliant, David. Simon had stared at David with the full force of the caustic wit Mélanie had never seen him turn on his lover. The Government used troops to break up a peaceful meeting. Women and children were trampled in the streets. And you’re going to make a speech saying they shouldn’t have done it.

Althorp’s motion for a Parliamentary inquiry into Peterloo didn’t pass. By 30 December (just days before The Mask of Night begins), Parliament passed the Six Acts proposed by the Government. Magistrates could search private houses without warrants and summarily arrest and sentence anyone they suspected. Meetings of more than fifty persons required the permission of a sheriff or magistrate. Anyone attending a meeting for the purpose of drill or training in weapons was liable to arrest and transportation. “Seditious libel” (a term that could be made to encompass just about anything a magistrate wanted it to encompass) could lead to immediate prosecution. And a stamp duty brought the cost of periodicals up to at least sixpence, which made it more difficult to disseminate information.

The Mask of Night unfolds against this backdrop, in a city seething with suppressed unrest, teetering on a knife edge between reaction and reform. These issues form the basis of the conflicts for the central characters, real and fictional. The Comte de Flahaut and Hortense Bonaparte are each, in their own way, attempting to find safety in the post Waterloo world. The Foreign Secretary, Lord Castlereagh, and my fictional Lord Carfax (Charles’s former chief from his intelligence days) and are determined to suppress dissent and unrest at all cost. Charles and his Oxford friends and fellow MPs, David and Oliver Lydgate, are increasingly frustrated at the possibility of any sort of reform. Simon questions the possibility of effecting change through legal means at all and doesn’t reveal all his activities to David. Mélanie and Charles face that fact that the past is not as far behind them as they would like it be. At heart Mélanie is still a revolutionary (and now free to voice her opinions to her husband) while Charles, however reform-minded, is still a member of the aristocracy. As Charles says in this exchange with Mélanie:

We listen to the evidence and we each make up our own mind and act as we see fit. Same as we’ve always done.”

And if we make up our minds differently?

It won’t be the first time we’ve been on opposite sides. Only this time the battle will be out in the open.

In my post on 1817, I asked about the tension between the often intimate canvas of a novel and hte wider context in which the novel is set. But what about books in which issues involved in the wider context form the basis for the characters' conflicts. Writers, have you written books like this? Did you begin with the characters or the historical context? What were the particular challenges? Readers, is this a kind of a book you like to read? Why or why not? Any interesting examples to recommend?

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Blogger Elizabeth Kerri Mahon said...

Tracy, you've got me excited to read Mask of Night. I hope that it gets published. Its funny I had just finished reading about Napoleon and his mistress Marie Walewski, and Talleyrand and Flahaut were mentioned. I love reading books like this that encompass romance with the historical background. I cut my teeth on writers such as Anya Seton, Taylor Caldwell, and John Jakes. While I love lighter books, sometimes I crave something meatier.

As for my own work, my historical YA came about from an article that I read in American Heritage magazine and then grew from there. My heroine's decision at the beginning of the book comes about solely because of what is going on at the time in the US in 1895.

5:24 AM  
Blogger Tracy Grant said...

Thanks, Elizabeth! Your YA historical YA book sounds great. I love stories that are grounded in particular events. Did the idea for the book come about because you were reading about the U.S. in 1895? Or were you working on the story and those events fit with your heroine?

8:54 AM  
Blogger Elizabeth Kerri Mahon said...

The article sparked the idea and I chose 1895, because of the way that society was becoming structured in America, the divide between the wealthy and the poor was becoming even greater than it had been in the past. I wanted to show the contrast between the way my heroine lived and the way that several of the students who were wealthy lived. Plus 1895 is the gay 90's, Gibson Girl, Ragtime, central heating etc. It's just before the Spanish-American war.

8:58 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Wow, Tracy. You really make the personal leap out of that political morass. I love this kind of thing!!! Pam featured Peterloo in her last book and I’ve been fascinated ever since (I knew about it beforehand, but I’d never really grasped all the particulars).

9:13 AM  
Blogger Tracy Grant said...

That sounds fascinating, Elizabeth--the gulf between rich and poor is such a wonderfully complex subject to explore. I love how stories and historical eras mesh together.

Kalen, thanks so much! I think Pam's "The Slightest Provocation" is actually set in 1817 and deals with the Pentrich protests, slightly earlier than Peterloo but the social forces at work are much the same. Agents provocateurs were involved in the Pentrich events too (in fact, I believe Pam and her husband did research in Home Office archives--Pam?).

9:40 AM  
Blogger Pam Rosenthal said...

Thrilling, Tracy. Really. Hurry up. I can't wait.

I tried to write a sequel to The Slightest Provocation that would end at Peterloo, but I failed miserably. The idea was to write a romance between Mary Penley's rejected off-stage lover Matthew Bakewell (the good, decent Manchester manufacturer) and Fannie Grandin, one of the other characters in The Slightest Provocation.

But I'm not good at romance sequels. And frankly, I was too daunted by the labor conditions in 1819 Manchester to be able to write the book. (I should have realized that, after seeing the contortions Mrs. Gaskell had to go through in North and South -- not her best, imo, even if the Masterpiece Theater version has its virtues).

A pity, though, because I would have loved to write the scene in which my hero and heroine travel to Manchester after an all-night journey. And as the sun comes over the hills they see the working people from all the outlying regions, marching over the hills to the city, dressed in their best, the women in white, men and women both with greenery in their hats, to convene at St. Peter's Fields.

10:43 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Ok, I knew Pam and I had discussed Peterloo at some point. I so can't wait for BENEATH A SILENT MOON!!!

12:01 PM  
Blogger Amanda Elyot said...

Tracy, the actual history is so amazing and compelling, and I know you'll seamlessly weave it into your new story. You explain the climate of the times so stunningly in this post. Sometimes I think the Hoydens beat the history books, hands down, for clear and exciting presentation of the events as they were.

1:16 PM  
Blogger Kathrynn Dennis said...

Me too, Tracy. What Amanda said.

The way you breath life into the past and weave the history into the
lives of the heroine and hero is wonderful.

Best of luck with "Mask of Night."

Great title, too.

2:50 PM  
Blogger Amanda Elyot said...

To answer your question, Tracy, in TOO GREAT A LADY, I used the historical fact that Emma and her husband, Sir William Hamilton, His Majesty's Ambassador to the Court of the Two Sicilies, were of differing views on how to handle the bloody and violent counter-revolution that took place in early 1799 after they (thanks to Lord Nelson) has spirited the King and Queen of Naples to their sister kingdom in Sicily. Emma was all in favor, as was Nelson, of quashing the uprising -- even though a British subject had no right or moral authority to get involved. Nelson who hated Napoleon "as you must hate the devil," saw the spreading Jacobinism as a disease that must be stopped and its purveyors punished. In his capacity as Ambassador, the now old and weary Hamilton knew it was absolutely not his purview to get involved. This caused a rift between himself and his beloved Emma; and her gung-ho (and misguided) views placed her in continued proximity with Nelson, who took it upon himself to advise the displaced royals on how to handle the situation. It was then that Emma and Nelson became lovers -- the proximity in Palermo, the headiness of collaborating on a joint venture that could shape world events, plus the physical attraction -- it was all too powerful a cocktail.

3:55 PM  
Blogger Amanda Elyot said...

P.S., Tracy -- my fellow Shakespearean ... is the new title MASK OF NIGHT taken from Juliet's speech, "Thou know'st the mask of night is on my face/else would a maiden blush bepaint my cheek for that which thou has heard me speak tonight."


3:57 PM  
Blogger Evangeline Holland said...

I was first introduced to Peterloo through Jane Feather's Vixen, so I'm interested to read your take on it Tracy.

And can I say wow?

I always love behind the book tidbits, and I am in awe over how you've taken the Regency era and revealed the darker, seamier underbelly rarely seen. The period is characterized as light, frothy and gay--and that is the furthest thing from the truth!

I'm getting itchy and excited just thinking about delving into the background of this book.

5:26 PM  
Blogger Tracy Grant said...

Pam, just reading your description of that one scene makes me want to read that book! Maybe you'll go back to it someday? I'd love to help you brainstorm it!

Kalen, Amanda, and Kathrynn, thanks so much for the nice words!

Amanda, the disagreement between Emma and Sir William over the situation in Naples is fascinating. I knew a bit about Emma siding with the King and Queen, but somehow I hadn't realized how it played into her getting involved with Nelson. That's an example of how the personal and the political are so intertwined in real life as well as in fiction.

And yes, "The Mask of Night" is absolutely taken from R&J--I love Shakespearean titles!

5:32 PM  
Blogger Lauren Willig said...

Yay, "Mask of Night"! I can't wait to read it. I love the way you take a historical moment and show the very real and nuanced ways in which people react to it-- and what that does to their relationships.

My favorite example of historical conflicts driving character conflict is M.M. Kaye's "Trade Wind", in which the heroine, the aptly named Hero, is a crusading abolitionist, determined to bring the benefits of civilization to the benighted citizens of Zanzibar, while the hero, Rory, is a sometime slave trader determined to escape the stifling hand of civilization at all costs. Like Charles and Melanie, you know there'll never be an exact meeting of minds, that their attitudes towards life were shaped in very different crucibles. But it's that productive difference that makes their interactions so interesting-- particularly since it has no resolution.

7:03 PM  
Blogger Tracy Grant said...

Pam, I meant to add that I must confess I haven't actually read "North and South," though I enjoyed the television adaptation. Did you think Elizabeth Gaskell went through contortions to bring about a happy ending? 1819 labor conditions are indeed grim, but fascinating stories (and wonderful romances) can take place against grim backdrops. I still want you to write that book! (Btw, my mind *always* seems to think in terms of sequels:-)--I think it so interesting how different writers put their books together in different ways).

La belle americaine, I love Jane Feather's books, but I haven't read "Vixen" yet. I love exploring the darker side of the Regency--and the contrast between that and the Almack's and Gunter's and Mayfair side. It's such a fascinating era! I feel as though I'm constantly learning new things.

Lauen, I have to confess I also haven't read "Trade Wind" (lots of interesting soundings books to seek out), but the conflict sounds fabulous. I think it's so interesting when two people fall in love who (as you so eloquently put it) have been shaped in such different crucibles that there will never be an exact meeting of their minds. If you're writing toward a happy ending, it can make it difficult to pull off, but it can also make for very compelling drama and an interesting exploration of issues.

11:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Free Web Site Counter
Kennedy Western University Online